* If any instances of plagiarism are evident, reviews will be returned to students without a grade.
* The review should be between 2-3 pages in length.
Items of Evaluation
Scale
1. Collaboration between partners explained and undertaken well.
1--2--3--4
2. Background information of the Webquest is comprehensive (e.g. URL, grade level, subject area, targeted audience, proficiency level etc.).
3. A lesson overview is provided. (e.g. goals, tasks, process, resources, evaluation)
0.5--1.5--2.5
4. Discussion of Constructivist Principles is extensive and detailed (at least 3-5 principles mentioned)
5. Discussion of the suitability of the Webquest to ELLs described well.
1--2--3
6. Suggestions for Webquest improvement provided
7. Webquest review is submitted on time
Total
/20
Grade Allocation: 18.0-20.0 = A 15.0 -17.0 = B 12.0 -14.0 = C 09.0 -11.0 = D